RPA & Enterprise Automation

RPA that still works in year three

Most automation estates do not fail at go-live. They degrade — a screen changes, a developer leaves, success rates drift down, and the exceptions quietly go back to the team the bots were supposed to free up. Licences renew regardless. We recover estates that have stopped paying back, run them properly, and build new automation designed for the third year rather than the first demo.

Book a callStart with an estate health check

Start here: the estate health check

A two-week fixed-fee review of what you already have running. You get:

  • Bot-by-bot inventory: what runs, what fails, what has not run in months
  • Actual success rates against reported ones, from Orchestrator logs rather than from a status deck
  • Licence utilisation against licence spend
  • A repair-versus-rebuild-versus-retire call on every automation in the estate
  • A written remediation plan you keep either way

The fee is credited in full against remediation work started within 60 days. If the honest answer is that a third of your estate should be switched off, that is what the report will say. Retiring automation that costs more to maintain than the process it replaced is a result, not a failure.

What we do

Estate recovery

Take over an automation estate somebody else built. We stabilise what runs, repair what has broken, retire what should not be maintained, and document what was never documented. You do not need the original developer, the original design documents, or an explanation of why it got this way.

Managed operations

Ongoing run and support: monitoring, exception handling, change requests, and the maintenance work that determines whether an estate lasts. Committed monthly capacity rather than a break-fix scramble.

New automation build

Processes automated properly the first time — resilient selectors, centralised object repositories, real exception handling, and a design that survives an application upgrade. Built with the regression coverage that verifies it, scoped in the same engagement rather than funded later.

Migration and consolidation

Moving between platforms, consolidating tools acquired department by department, or lifting an estate from a legacy version. Includes the assessment that establishes what is actually worth migrating, which is usually less than the inventory suggests.

Patterns we build

The estate nobody owns

The person who built it moved on, the CoE was disbanded in a reorganisation, and the bots are maintained by whoever notices the failure email. Nothing is documented. We reverse-engineer the estate into an inventory, establish real success rates, and hand back an owned, documented, monitored set of automations with a maintenance model attached.

Success rates that quietly drifted

A bot reported as 95% successful is actually completing 60% of cases, with the rest handled manually by someone who stopped raising it months ago. The gap between reported and actual is where the business case went. Establishing the real number is usually the most uncomfortable and most valuable output of a health check.

Licences renewing on bots that do not run

Unattended licences allocated to automations that last executed in the previous financial year. Straightforward to find, straightforward to reclaim, and frequently pays for the remediation work outright.

Automation built against a screen that no longer exists

An application upgrade changed the UI and forty automations broke at once, because every one of them held its own selector definitions. We rebuild the selector layer against a centralised object repository so the next upgrade breaks one definition rather than forty.

The process that should have been fixed, not automated

Sometimes the honest finding is that a bot is compensating for a broken process, a bad integration, or a missing API — and the right answer is to fix the underlying system and switch the bot off. We will say so. It costs us the build and saves you the maintenance.

Automation shipping faster than it can be verified

RPA changes go out weekly; the regression suite that should catch what breaks is run manually before go-live, if at all. Because we build both layers, test coverage is scoped alongside the automation it verifies rather than funded separately and later. See automated testing.

Platforms

Automation platforms. We build and support on UiPath (Studio, Orchestrator, Document Understanding, Test Suite, Agent Builder), Power Automate, and SAP iRPA. We take over estates built on other platforms, including ones we would not have chosen, and will tell you honestly whether a migration is worth its cost or whether staying put and stabilising is the better call.

Enterprise applications we automate. SAP (GUI, Fiori, S/4HANA), Salesforce, Oracle E-Business Suite and Fusion, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 — plus the desktop applications, Citrix sessions, mail and spreadsheets that real processes pass through on the way. Oracle EBS Forms and SAP GUI are the two environments where generic web automation tooling most often fails, and both are within scope.

We are not a reseller and have no licensing incentive. The recommendation is whatever gives you working automation at the lowest total cost of ownership.

Frequently asked questions

Find out what your estate is actually doing

Two weeks, fixed fee, a bot-by-bot picture of what runs and what does not — and a repair, rebuild or retire call on every automation. Fee credited against remediation started within 60 days.

Start with an estate health checkBook a call

Explore related solutions:

UiPath test automation→SAP test automation→Agentic AI development→Pricing and engagement models→All services→

Connect With Us

Let's Build Something Remarkable

Whether you have a specific project in mind or want to explore possibilities, reach out — you will hear back from a senior engineer, not a sales team.

Headquarters

Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Send a Message

Start with an Audit

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chat on WhatsApp