SAP Automation
SAP changes constantly — transports, support packs, quarterly cloud releases, an S/4HANA programme running underneath all of it. The regression testing that is supposed to keep pace is, in most organisations, still a manual exercise owned by the business users who know the process. We build automated end-to-end business process suites across SAP GUI, Fiori and the systems SAP touches.
Coverage organised by business process, not by transaction code. Order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, record-to-report, hire-to-retire — tested as the process runs, across every screen and system it touches, rather than as a set of isolated transaction checks that all pass while the process is broken.
A conversion programme needs a baseline: what the business process does today, evidenced, so you can prove what it does after. We build the pre-conversion suite, run it against the legacy system, and re-run it against S/4HANA wave by wave. The suite becomes the regression pack you keep after go-live.
SAP cloud products release on a fixed quarterly cadence you do not control. Support packs and enhancement packs land on your own schedule. Both need the same thing: a repeatable pack that runs before the change reaches production, without pulling business users out of their day jobs for a week.
Real business processes do not stay inside SAP. They start in a portal, pass through SAP GUI, generate a document, get approved by email, and land in a spreadsheet. We automate the whole path — which is precisely where web-only test tooling stops being useful.
Business processes rarely stay inside one platform. An order can originate in Salesforce, be fulfilled in SAP, and be reported somewhere else again. Testing each system in isolation proves that each screen works; it does not prove the process does.
We build test coverage across the enterprise applications SAP sits alongside:
Lightning and Classic, including flows that hand off to SAP for fulfilment or billing
Including EBS Forms, which most web-oriented test tooling cannot address
Finance, operations and CRM modules
A single automated test can start in the CRM, cross into the ERP, and validate the financial outcome at the end. That is the coverage that tells you the business process works, rather than that its components do.
Sales order through delivery, billing, and posting — validated against expected financial outcomes, not just against screens completing without error. Runs overnight before every transport window, with failures classified before anyone reads them.
The programme is midway through and nobody can state, with evidence, what the current system does for a given business process. Building the pre-conversion suite is slower than skipping it and faster than arguing about whether a post-go-live defect is new.
SAP releases on schedule whether or not the business has capacity to regression test. Automating the highest-risk processes turns a recurring resourcing negotiation into a scheduled run.
A transport moves and something unrelated breaks three weeks later. Automated smoke and regression triggered on transport import into QA closes the gap between the change and the discovery.
The close is the process with the least tolerance for a regression and the least available time to test one. Automated verification of the close sequence and its financial outputs runs when the business cannot.
An opportunity closes in Salesforce, an order is created in SAP, fulfilment and billing follow, and revenue is recognised. Every team tests its own system and the handoffs are tested by nobody, because they belong to nobody. Integration defects surface in production as orders that exist on one side and not the other. Automated end-to-end coverage across both platforms puts the handoff under test.
We build primarily on UiPath Test Suite and UiPath Test Cloud, which handle SAP GUI, Fiori, and cross-application flows in a single framework, and integrate with the RPA layer where SAP automation already exists. Where a process is purely Fiori or web, we use Playwright. Where you already run a different platform, we work in it rather than arguing for a migration.
We are not an SAP reseller and we do not have a licensing incentive. The recommendation is whatever gives you defensible coverage at the lowest maintenance cost.
A two-week assessment maps your business processes against current test coverage and returns a prioritised automation backlog. Fee credited in full against a build started within 60 days.
Explore related solutions:
Connect With Us
Whether you have a specific project in mind or want to explore possibilities, reach out — you will hear back from a senior engineer, not a sales team.